Comments on: Database Usage with Web Apps https://blog.xojo.com/2016/06/28/database-usage-with-web-apps/ Blog about the Xojo programming language and IDE Wed, 21 Sep 2016 18:17:35 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Paul Lefebvre https://blog.xojo.com/2016/06/28/database-usage-with-web-apps/#comment-35 Thu, 07 Jul 2016 00:10:15 +0000 http://blogtemp.xojo.com/2016/06/15/database-usage-with-web-apps/#comment-35 In reply to Robert Litchfield.

Thanks, Robert. I’ve fixed the link.

]]> By: Robert Litchfield https://blog.xojo.com/2016/06/28/database-usage-with-web-apps/#comment-33 Wed, 06 Jul 2016 21:44:27 +0000 http://blogtemp.xojo.com/2016/06/15/database-usage-with-web-apps/#comment-33 The SQL Injection link is not working…getting a 404 error. 🙁

]]> By: Alyssa Foley https://blog.xojo.com/2016/06/28/database-usage-with-web-apps/#comment-18 Wed, 29 Jun 2016 16:33:34 +0000 http://blogtemp.xojo.com/2016/06/15/database-usage-with-web-apps/#comment-18 In reply to Nikato Muirhead.

While we may support this in the future, I don’t think we have any
immediate plans to at the moment. If you are interested in Xojo supporting this, please enter it into Feedback as a feature request.

]]> By: Alyssa Foley https://blog.xojo.com/2016/06/28/database-usage-with-web-apps/#comment-16 Wed, 29 Jun 2016 16:10:18 +0000 http://blogtemp.xojo.com/2016/06/15/database-usage-with-web-apps/#comment-16 In reply to Tim Ross.

Thanks, Tim. I’ve updated the link.

]]> By: Tim Ross https://blog.xojo.com/2016/06/28/database-usage-with-web-apps/#comment-15 Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:45:50 +0000 http://blogtemp.xojo.com/2016/06/15/database-usage-with-web-apps/#comment-15 The link at the bottom of the article doesn’t work – 404.

]]> By: Nikato Muirhead https://blog.xojo.com/2016/06/28/database-usage-with-web-apps/#comment-9 Wed, 29 Jun 2016 03:12:39 +0000 http://blogtemp.xojo.com/2016/06/15/database-usage-with-web-apps/#comment-9 Please advise if Xojo plans to support Flatpak or Snaps on linux. The community would surely like to know. Technically there would be no reason why you could not support both.

]]>